Why I’m Following the Burmese Student Protests, and the US Government Should Be Too

Over the past few months, the world has largely overlooked a series of peaceful protests by Burmese students that began in November, coinciding with President Obama’s visit to the Southeast Asian nation. The students are protesting the country’s new National Education Law, which maintains close, centralized government control of the nation’s educational institutions and limit students’ freedom of association (read more here). In January, students from across the country began a march to Rangoon. The demonstration has continued despite a televised government warning to cease protest activity and a sharp increase in the presence of security forces along the protest route. In a nation that has only recently begun to emerge from decades of brutal military rule, protest is a serious game with seriously high risks.

 

This is a defining moment in Burmese history, no matter the outcome. If the government is truly committed to future reforms—as it has assured its citizens, the US, and the United Nations that it is— then these relatively small, low-stakes protests are a critical litmus test. If the government lets the students carry on, even if it doesn’t give way on their demands, it will be an incredible sign of the regime’s honest intentions and commitment to progress. If, on the other hand, government security forces use violence to subdue a peaceful protest, there will be serious consequences. It could spark far larger-scale protests and re-ignite ethnic violence (which is, for the most part, currently subdued by precarious piecemeal ceasefires with insurgent groups) as citizens lose faith in the idea of government-guided, institutionalized reform. Violence against protesters would also signal to the international community that the regime's commitment to reform is fickle.

 

The Obama Administration has thus far pursued a policy of careful re-engagement with the Burmese regime, tempered by a reluctant Congress that has questioned the Burmese government’s commitment to reform. As the recent warnings to protesters and the bolstered security force presence show, the student protests are pushing the regime to the edge of its comfort zone. The government’s reaction (or inaction) as the students head towards Rangoon will be the clearest glimpse of the secretive Burmese regime’s true intentions that we’ve had in a long time. We ought to pay attention.

 

*I am an avid observer of Burmese politics. I have worked closely with the Kachin Women's Association Thailand, an organization that aids Kachin refugees, for about 3.5 years. I also spent a year working as a research assistant at Dartmouth College conducting research on the Karen National Union and Communist Party of Burma insurgencies.

 

Views: 219

Tags: Asia, Burma, Kachin, Myanmar, Obama, Rohingya, US, democracy, diplomacy, education, More…engagement, foreign, human, policy, protests, reform, rights, student

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Joselito Narciso B. Caparino on February 17, 2015 at 11:16am

We do hope for a peaceful showing of Burmese student and mass actions.

Carnegie Council

The Future of Artificial Intelligence, with Stuart J. Russell

UC Berkley's Professor Stuart J. Russell discusses the near- and far-future of artificial intelligence, including self-driving cars, killer robots, governance, and why he's worried that AI might destroy the world. How can scientists reconfigure AI systems so that humans will always be in control? How can we govern this emerging technology across borders? What can be done if autonomous weapons are deployed in 2020?

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.