US Presidential Candidates' Take on the Future of Funding in Science and Innovation

In a recent article in this month's Science magazine, the news staff summarizes President Obama's and Mr. Romney's views on how to promote and maintain a trend of scientific excellence and achievement in the United States...while paying down a 1.4 billion dollar deficit. This topic is of particular interest to a discussion of greater ethical implications as we know that innovation (commonly generated through the funding of science and engineering research and education initiatives) is key in a global, knowledge-driven economy. In other words, if the US continues its trend of limiting itself in the areas of science (including the promotion of science education) and engineering, how will it ever expect to contribute to current global technological advancements? 

The article, entitled "Congratulations! Now Get to to Work," looks at, among other things, how imminently scheduled cuts in funding to U.S. science agencies have taken on a new sense of urgency, despite being a well-worn topic in Congress and a constant source of paranoia and frustration in academic medicine. 

The article can be found here:


Views: 108

Tags: Presidential, US, engineering, race, science


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Carnegie Council on November 5, 2012 at 4:52pm

Very interesting, Ashleigh. It is my feeling that the United States has a global responsibility to fund basic science research and education, and that the price tag of doing so would be very small compared to some of our recent military adventures. Fortunately the globalization of science is well under way. Groups like Science and Development Network are doing a great job documenting the scientific flowering in places like Africa, and Carnegie Council's Policy Innovations has run a number of stories along these lines recently. --Evan

"Science Diplomacy in South Asia," by Saleem Ali and Bharath Gopalaswamy

Reinventing Discovery, with Michael Nielsen

Science and Innovation for Development, by Gordon Conway, Jeff Waage, and Sara Delaney

"Innovation: Applying Knowledge in Development," by Calestous Juma

"3D Printing Can Unlock Development Potential," Evan O'Neil interviews William Hoyle

"Using ICT to Enable Agricultural Innovation," by World Bank and FAO

Carnegie Council

Gen Z, Climate Change Activism, & Foreign Policy, with Tatiana Serafin

Generation Z makes up over 30 percent of the world's population and this group of people, most under the age of 20, are already having an extraordinary effect on society, culture, and politics. Tatiana Serafin, journalism professor at Marymount Manhattan College, breaks down the power of this generation, focusing on climate change activism. How can they turn their energy into concrete action?

The Power of Tribalism, with Amy Chua & Walter Russell Mead

"In our foreign policy, for at least half a century, we have been spectacularly blind to the power of tribal politics," says Amy Chua, author of "Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations." What does this mean in 2019? How can Americans move past tribalism? Don't miss this conversation with Chua and Bard College's Walter Russell Mead, moderated by Bard's Roger Berkowitz.

Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics, & Political Responsibility, with Stephen Gardiner

University of Washington's Professor Stephen Gardiner discusses the ethics of climate change from intergenerational, political, and personal perspectives. Should individuals feel bad for using plastic straws or eating meat? What should the UN and its member states do? And how can older generations make up for "a massive failure in leadership" that has led, in part, to the current crisis?





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.