US Presidential Candidates' Take on the Future of Funding in Science and Innovation

In a recent article in this month's Science magazine, the news staff summarizes President Obama's and Mr. Romney's views on how to promote and maintain a trend of scientific excellence and achievement in the United States...while paying down a 1.4 billion dollar deficit. This topic is of particular interest to a discussion of greater ethical implications as we know that innovation (commonly generated through the funding of science and engineering research and education initiatives) is key in a global, knowledge-driven economy. In other words, if the US continues its trend of limiting itself in the areas of science (including the promotion of science education) and engineering, how will it ever expect to contribute to current global technological advancements? 

The article, entitled "Congratulations! Now Get to to Work," looks at, among other things, how imminently scheduled cuts in funding to U.S. science agencies have taken on a new sense of urgency, despite being a well-worn topic in Congress and a constant source of paranoia and frustration in academic medicine. 

The article can be found here: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/338/6106/456.full

 

Views: 117

Tags: Presidential, US, engineering, race, science

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Carnegie Council on November 5, 2012 at 4:52pm

Very interesting, Ashleigh. It is my feeling that the United States has a global responsibility to fund basic science research and education, and that the price tag of doing so would be very small compared to some of our recent military adventures. Fortunately the globalization of science is well under way. Groups like Science and Development Network are doing a great job documenting the scientific flowering in places like Africa, and Carnegie Council's Policy Innovations has run a number of stories along these lines recently. --Evan

"Science Diplomacy in South Asia," by Saleem Ali and Bharath Gopalaswamy

Reinventing Discovery, with Michael Nielsen

Science and Innovation for Development, by Gordon Conway, Jeff Waage, and Sara Delaney

"Innovation: Applying Knowledge in Development," by Calestous Juma

"3D Printing Can Unlock Development Potential," Evan O'Neil interviews William Hoyle

"Using ICT to Enable Agricultural Innovation," by World Bank and FAO

Carnegie Council

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?

Democratic Candidates & Foreign Policy after Iowa, with Nikolas Gvosdev

With the (incomplete) results of the Iowa Caucus putting the spotlight on Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, what do we know about their foreign policy platforms? How do they differentiate themselves from Joe Biden? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev shares his thoughts and touches on voters' possible perception of Sanders as a "socialist" and how climate change could become an issue in this election.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.