Public Trust and Brasil's Free Fare Movement

On the first day of the Carnegie Council's Global Ethics Dialogues in Rio de Janeiro, the city, along with many of Brazil's major metropolitan areas, was the site of a massive "social manifestation" aimed at expressing widespread public discontent. More than 100,000 protesters turned out in both Rio and Sao Paolo, and estimates of 10,000-40,000 are also being reported in Belem and Salvador as well. The demonstrations are being characterized as a reaction to a proposed bus fare hike, but are also focused on a range of related issues about public transportation, infrastructure, and social services. 

The protests underscore the relevance of the Dialogues' dual focus on corruption and sustainability. One media account quotes a participant as saying, "It's about much more than [a hike in bus fare]. It's about a society that is sick of corrupt politicians not making good on their promises to make improvements." Many protesters carried Brazilian flags, the motto of which had been abbreviated from "Order and Progress" to "in Progress." The benefits of progress, the symbol indicates, are not being fully shared by all Brazilians.

The people I have spoken with point to any number of public works programs intended to develop the nation's infrastructure and wonder aloud about the transparency of the financing and question the benefit to the working class. This is especially striking in Rio, where numerous construction projects related to the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympics are currently underway. The popular sentiment here seems to be the concern that Brazil's rapid growth over the past decade has not been effectively directed at the public benefit.

Transportation, health, and education are areas where substantive, transparent investments would bring more tangible benefits. Instead, the protesters assert, government funds are squandered and mismanaged. Access to a robust, low-cost public transportation network is an important social good for Brazil's students and working classes, but there remains a sizable gap between their vision of a sustainable and egalitarian urban society and actions of the current government. 

[PHOTO CREDIT: Izaias Buson (CC).]

Views: 181

Tags: #changebrazil, Brazil, Corruption, Dialogues, Ethics, Global, Sustainability


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?

Democratic Candidates & Foreign Policy after Iowa, with Nikolas Gvosdev

With the (incomplete) results of the Iowa Caucus putting the spotlight on Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, what do we know about their foreign policy platforms? How do they differentiate themselves from Joe Biden? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev shares his thoughts and touches on voters' possible perception of Sanders as a "socialist" and how climate change could become an issue in this election.





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.