Political and social legal contract initiative

The most important instrument to use where politicians are to be encourage to be more systematical, effective as well as more committed, is by incoporating this initiative. By allowing this ideal initiative into operation in a country,more less developed state will enhance the desired developmental goal.

The political and social contracts are to be drawn each time an election is due.This means that all such person ought to be or must be made subject to this process conditional term while been eligible to participate in any democratic election.

Reason of this initiatiative is that in the past, as well as at current times, politicians have had reduced doing their responsibilities. For example not working to their best their abilities.Thereby, such results into negligence and other reckless motives or intention.The end result is that the intended goal or purpose of an election is defeated.


Therefore,because of the Concept of Democracy which ought to give the attention and advancement in its area of development in order to purposefully work accordingly with its founding principles and rules.

On the other hand, this initiative creates legal terms which ought to state before such a person occupy the political office.This intiative will keep checks and balances within polical offices.

However, some its effect once this initiative has been adopted by any country, will help the people called citizens to have systematical voice of power.This simply means that in a case of officials making bad decision. For example refusing to adhere to the rule of law. A particular state can oppose by commercing a trial before the respective courts.This helps to safe guard lives during the 'transition of power' by political officers.

[for more info or any interest shown to the above idea.kindly comment or send me a message.

Views: 8

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The Ethics of Trade with China and Authoritarian Upgrading

Increased foreign investment and engagement is producing, not democratization, but "authoritarian upgrading," where selected reforms are designed to legitimize a softer authoritarianism. This presents an ethical dilemma for international trade. What direction will China, Uzbekistan, Russia, and other "upgraded authoritarian" states evolve towards in the coming decade?

The 2020 Election & the View from Overseas, with Nikolas Gvosdev

As the 2020 election begins to come into focus, Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev details the foreign policy cleavages in the Democratic Party. Plus, referencing Nahal Toosi's recent article in "Politico," he discusses the worries that many in Europe have about a Trump reelection or a progressive candidate who also questions the status quo. What's the view from abroad on this turbulent time in American politics?

Ethics & the U.S.-China Trade War, with Nikolas Gvosdev

What role should ethics play in the U.S.-China trade war? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev looks at these economic tensions in the context of the Uyghur detention and the Hong Kong protests, different theories on integrating China into the world economy, and what it could mean to "lose" in this conflict. Is there a breaking point in terms of China's human rights policies? What's the view in Africa and Europe?

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.