Philosophy and Education in Brazil: Teaching Kant to Grade Schoolers

In a fascinating article in the most recent issue of the Boston Review, explores the mandated teaching of philosophy to all Brazilian public school students. The program has been in force since 2008 and is the largest in the world.

The first thing I found interesting was how the program came about. It was as an attempt to undo the curricula instituted by the erstwhile Brazilian military dictatorship, and encourage an engaged democratic citizenry:

In 1971 the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964 to 1985 eliminated philosophy from high schools. Teachers, professors in departments of education, and political activists championed its return, while most academic philosophers were either indifferent or suspicious. The dictatorship seems to have understood philosophy’s potential to create engaged citizens; it replaced philosophy with a course on Moral and Civic Education and one on Brazil’s Social and Political Organization (“to inculcate good manners and patriotic values and to justify the political order of the generals,” one UFBA colleague recalls from his high school days).

The official rationale for the 2008 law is that philosophy “is necessary for the exercise of citizenship.” The law—the world’s largest-scale attempt to bring philosophy into the public sphere—thus represents an experiment in democracy. Among teachers at least, many share Ribeiro’s hope that philosophy will provide a path to greater civic participation and equality. Can it do even more? Can it teach students to question and challenge the foundations of society itself?

But, as with many education-related matters, Brazil's program has been controversial, Fraenkel says. First, some Brazilian academic philosophers and educators believe that in a country as poor as Brazil, teaching philosophy to young students who may be barely literate is an example of misplaced priorities. Basic literacy and math should be the focus, they say. Philosophy is an academic profession, or at least one that is inappropriate for those without training in more basic areas. On the other side are educators who believe that this attitude is totally elitist. They believe that even poor, uneducated students are capable of understanding philosophical arguments, and that it may have a beneficial effect on their citizenship capabilities.

I admit to being torn here, given my background and love for the discipline of philosophy. The question, I think, is not one of the value of philosophy itself, but about priorities. Another concern I have is that teaching philosophy is not to be taken lightly. Learning about, say, Rousseau or Nietzsche from the wrong person can jaundice ones views of not only these thinkers but of philosophy itself. And the last thing I'd want a student to take away from early instruction in philosophy is a distorted view of what philosophy in fact is, and why it matters.


Views: 1989

Tags: brazil, education, philosophy


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The Crack-Up: The 1919 Elaine Massacre & the Struggle to Remember, with Nan Woodruff

The massacre in rural Elaine, Arkansas was one of the most violent episodes of 1919's Red Summer of racist confrontations, but it also remains one of the least-known. In this talk with historian Ted Widmer, Penn State's Professor Nan Woodruff explains the causes and how it fits in to the post-World War I context. Why are people still reluctant to speak about this massacre? How should we remember this dark chapter in American history?

The Individual & the Collective, Politics, & the UN, with Jean-Marie Guéhenno

Carnegie Council Senior Fellow Jean-Marie Guéhenno, former head of United Nations peacekeeping operations, discusses the tensions between the individual and the collective in a world filled with political tension, pervasive surveillance, and fear of risk. What is the role of the UN in this environment? How can we avoid the violent upheavals that marked other transitional phases in humanity?

A Russian Take on the Kurds and U.S. Foreign Policy

A Russian defense news site declared the United States an "unreliable ally" after the the withdrawal of American troops from Northern Syria. Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev connects this characterization to the need for leaders to connect a specific policy action to a larger, understandable narrative for the American public.





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.