Nominations Open for Tanenbaum's Peacemakers in Action Award

Tanenbaum is searching for the next Peacemakers in Action.

Tanenbaum responds to the wars, religious tensions and sectarian battles that make the world so dangerous by working with religiously motivated men and women who risk their well-being to resolve these conflicts - including those involving religion. These selfless individuals are Peacemakers in Action.

Tanenbaum provides training and a Network of support for these locally based individuals, while also implementing strategies to promote religious peacemaking as a vocation. They are now accepting nominations for their Peacemaker in Action Award from which they will name two new Peacemakers and provide them with $15,000 each to reinforce their work. Tanenbaum invites you to submit a nomination and to help them identify more unsung heroes.

Tanenbaum's Peacemakers are doing work that is both necessary - and hard to imagine. Peacemakers in Action risk their lives every day to promote peace in regions beset with conflict and violence:

  • Deng Giguiento’s profound commitment towards interfaith peacebuilding is an expression of her Catholic faith. For more than 20 years, she has worked on the ground in the Mindanao conflict in the Philippines, creating alliances among conflicting Christian, Muslim and indigenous groups.
  • Sheikh Abdulrahman Al-Marwani is a trusted mediator in war-torn Yemen. Despite the ongoing carnage, he bravely travels within his country to facilitate interfaith collaborations, resolve disputes involving marginalized communities and advocate against a culture of weapons and armed violence.

To be considered for the Peacemaker in Action Award and become a member of Tanenbaum's Peacemakers in Action Network, nominees must meet five criteria:

  1. Religious Motivation — Their peacemaking work has been fueled by their religious and/or spiritual beliefs.
  2. Armed Conflict — They work or have worked in an area of armed conflict.
  3. At Risk — Their lives and/or liberty have been at risk as they pursued peace.
  4. Locally Based — They are closely connected to the conflict situation at the local level. Most awardees are indigenous to the communities they serve, but some have left their original homes and spent many years embedded in a new environment.
  5. Relatively Unknown — Despite their impact, they have not received significant international attention or support at the time of selection.

To nominate an individual for Tanenbaum's Peacemaker in Action Award, please go to


To read more about the process, criteria and what awardees receive, please go to

Views: 159

Tags: award


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Loisach Group and the Democratic Community Narrative

Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev reports from the Berlin meetings of the Losiach Group, a U.S.-German strategic dialogue, where the trans-Atlantic relationship and the rise of China are important points of discussion. Could countering China be the basis of a new Euro-American conneciton?

The Ethics of Gene Editing & Human Enhancement, with Julian Savulescu

What does "good ethics" means when it comes to gene editing? What types of conversations should we be having about this technology? Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, shares his thoughts on these topics and more, including moral and human enhancement, and why he called Dr. He Jiankui's experiment "monstrous."

Vox Populi, Eurasia Group Foundation, and Narratives

The Eurasia Group Foundation (EGF) has released its report on public attitudes towards U.S. foreign policy. Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that, like the project on U.S. Global Engagement at the Carnegie Council, EGF is attempting to get at the twin issues of "the chasm which exists between the interests and concerns of foreign policy elites and those of ordinary citizens" and "the reasons why Americans are increasingly disenfranchised from foreign policy decisions being made in Washington."





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.