Just Out: "Update on the Rule of Law for Human Rights in ASEAN"

Update on the Rule of Law for Human Rights in ASEAN: The Path to Integration

Carnegie Council Pacific Fellow Francis Tom Temprosa is the lead researcher for an important new report titled Update on the Rule of Law for Human Rights in ASEAN: The Path to Integration. Composed of 10 Country Reports and a Synthesis Report, this study from the Human Rights Resource Centre in Jakarta, Indonesia, analyses the policy and legislative changes that have taken place in the ten ASEAN member states since 2011. It also considers whether these changes support or detract from ASEAN's vision of becoming a "rules-based" community.

The update is a follow-up on Rule of Law for Human Rights in the ASEAN Region: A Base-line Study, published five years earlier in 2011. Led by Mr. Temprosa, a Filipino lawyer and faculty member of the Ateneo de Manila University Law School, the new study first considers whether individual member states' commitment to establish and maintain the rule of law is being upheld by updating the 2011 report's findings around four formal and substantive central principles in relation to human rights, namely:

(i) Principle I: Whether the government, including its officials and agents, are subject to the law under the Constitution and other legislation
(ii) Principle II: Whether laws and procedures for arrest, detention and punishment are publicly available, lawful and not arbitrary.
(iii) Principle III: Whether persons have access to justice as the process by which laws are enacted and enforced is accessible, fair, efficient, and equally applied.
(iv) Principle IV: Whether justice is administered by a competent, impartial, and independent judiciary and justice institutions.

The update goes on to consider what progress has been made toward establishing a rules-based community of shared values and norms and whether the process of ASEAN integration has accelerated activity toward the creation of stronger legal institutions within ASEAN Member States.

ABOUT THE HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE
The Human Rights Resource Centre is a non-profit academic center headquartered at the University of Indonesia in Jakarta, with a partnership network throughout Southeast Asia (currently in 7 out of 10 ASEAN Member States.)

CARNEGIE COUNCIL'S ASIA DIALOGUES PROGRAM PACIFIC FELLOWS 
By conducting original, empirical research and facilitating educational exchange, the Asia Dialogues Program seeks to advance ethical inquiry around contentions within Asia and the United States. The Program's Pacific Fellows are leading scholars and experts who contribute to a worldwide discussion of ethical contentions in the U.S.-Asia context.

ABOUT CARNEGIE COUNCIL
Founded by Andrew Carnegie in 1914, Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs is an educational, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that produces lectures, publications, and multimedia materials on the ethical challenges of living in a globalized world.

Views: 101

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Privacy, Surveillance, & the Terrorist Trap, with Tom Parker

How can investigators utilize new technology like facial recognition software while respecting the rights of suspects and the general public? What are the consequences of government overreaction to terrorist threats? Tom Parker, author of "Avoiding the Terrorist Trap," discusses privacy, surveillance, and more in the context of counterterrorism.

A Parting of Values: America First versus Transactionalism

"The existing divide in American foreign policy discourse has been the extent to which the U.S. must actively propagate and spread its values, or defend them or promote them even when there is no interest at stake," writes Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev. How does American civil society demand consideration of moral and ethical concerns in the decisions both to go to war and how the war will be prosecuted?

Suleimani Is Dead, but Diplomacy Shouldn’t Be

Carnegie Council fellow and Pacific Delegate Philip Caruso advocates for the value of diplomacy in the aftermath of the U.S. killing Iran's general Qassem Suleimani. "Iran cannot win a war against the United States, nor can the United States afford to fight one," he argues. This article was originally published in "Foreign Policy" and is posted here with kind permission.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.