Israel-Gaza Conflict: Here We Are Again

To begin, I want to make my view clear that the attacks by both Israel and Hamas must be strongly condemned. Both sides have been displaying utter disregard for the right to life and a clear lack of interest in holding those responsible (including senior political and military leaders) accountable for grave human rights violations and violations of international law. This lack of accountability may have been a key factor in the resumption of hostilities and in the loss of hope for a peaceful and durable solution to the conflict that has existed for long between Israelis and Palestinians.

The ongoing indiscriminate targeting of civilians in conflict is illegal under international law and also morally reprehensible, even when one claims their right to self-defense. According to estimates by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), thousands (several of which were children) have been killed and injured since the fighting began on 7 July when Israel launched a military operation with the objective of halting rocket fire into its territory. Over 70% of those targeted have been civilians, and attacks have been launched onto hospitals, clinics and refugee camps, among other densely populated areas, such as residential homes. Meanwhile, Israel claims that Hamas militants have been using their own population as human shields by hiding them in these places.

On 23 July 2014, the UN Human Rights Council took a vote in Geneva to set up an independent investigative commission into what has been occurring in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian territories. The commission would be an international one and would specifically investigate all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. A seemingly well-intended first step was supported by 29 out of the 47 Council member states (with the exception of the US and 10 European countries) but has received criticism from Israel, which has already stated that it will not cooperate with the commission given that it views the Human Rights Council as anti-Israel. To refresh our minds, there is a precedent of lack of cooperation by Israel with a similar body. A UN Fact-finding Mission report on the Gaza Conflict dated 2009 (known as the 'Goldstone Report' due to the last name of the former judge and prosecutor who led the investigation) concluded that, in the context of Operation Cast Lead offensive of 2008-09, both sides had committed war crimes. On that occasion, once again, Israel rejected the findings of the document.

Beyond any legal analysis and moral speeches, the reality is that what is taking place right now is a massacre. Without entering into the debate surrounding the principle of proportionality, each side has a share of the blame in this situation and each side has undermined their own causes by showing a lack of restraint in their responses, making inflammatory statements that contain zero respect for victims, and just simply showing a lack of humanity. A cease-fire is needed immediately to allow for humanitarian relief efforts but a short-term halt will not, by any means, constitute a real solution that will withstand the passing of time. For that to happen, a lot will have to change, starting with discussing the fundamental issues, including the role of the Palestinian Authority in its control of Gaza and the existence of a two-state solution.

Views: 143

Tags: 2014, Conflict, Council, Diplomacy, Gaza, Human, Israel, Israeli, Palestine, Palestinian, More…Rights, UN, Un

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 30, 2015 at 3:58pm

The US has tried "time and time again" to broker an Israel-Palestine Peace Accord.  I was fortunate to be involved in Defense Cooperation Part of the Camp David Peace Accord between Israel & Egypt (which although costly to the US has held to this day).  . I recall the historic moment when I saw Sadat fly in to meet Begin.  IMHO, Peace has to come from within -both sides - can't be imposed by outside agents - Need People/Voter Power - Vision of Peace Win-Win Future versus infinite conflict.  

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on June 29, 2015 at 9:07am

I quite agree with you Jessica that a lot has to be done for an amicable resolution in that region. Indeed,there had been gross disrespect for human rights and international law from both sides.The idea of a two state solution had been and is being challenged by where to locate the Capital of Palestine nation which will be acceptable to both sides.I think the possession of East Jerusalem that is believed to be sacred to both party is a major contending issue.

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on June 29, 2015 at 9:07am
I quite agree with you Jessica that a lot has to be done for an amicable resolution in that region. Indeed,there had been gross disrespect for human rights and international law from both sides.The idea of a two state solution had been and is being challenged by where to locate the Capital of Palestine nation which will be acceptable to both sides.I think the possession of East Jerusalem that is believed to be sacred to both party is a major contending issue.
Comment by Untung Waluyo on June 28, 2015 at 1:24am

Never enaugh with a thousand more people die :( waluhyo

Carnegie Council

The Crack-Up: Dwight Eisenhower & the Road Trip that Changed America, with Brian C. Black

In 1919, a young Army officer named Dwight Eisenhower, along with a "Mad Max"-style military convoy, set out on a cross-country road trip to examine the nascent state of America's roads. Penn State Altoona's Professor Brian C. Black explains how this trip influenced Eisenhower's decisions decades later, both as general and president, and laid the groundwork for the rise of petroleum-based engines and the interstate highway system.

AI in the Arctic: Future Opportunities & Ethical Concerns, with Fritz Allhoff

How can artificial intelligence improve food security, medicine, and infrastructure in Arctic communities? What are some logistical, ethical, and governance challenges? Western Michigan's Professor Fritz Allhoff details the future of technology in this extreme environment, which is being made more accessible because of climate change. Plus he shares his thoughts on some open philosophical questions surrounding AI.

The Ethical Algorithm, with Michael Kearns

Over the course of a generation, algorithms have gone from mathematical abstractions to powerful mediators of daily life. They have made our lives more efficient, yet are increasingly encroaching on our basic rights. UPenn's Professor Michael Kearns shares some ideas on how to better embed human principles into machine code without halting the advance of data-driven scientific exploration.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.