There are two forms of government that is Monarch and Democratic. 

The difference between the two is that

1- In monarch you work under someone.

     In democracy someone works according to your wish.

2-  Leaders became generation wise.

     Leaders are made according to the will of the citiens.

3- It is nearly impossible to remove the leaders.

    Citizen don't vote to the bad leader and he or she can't win any election anymore.

4- They are not answerable to the citizens of the country.

    They are answerable to the citizens.

5- If the leader did wrong no one can punish or even say something to him.

    If the leader did wrong the people will not vote him in the next election.

From the above difference you must have understood that the country which has democratic form of government has more freedom than the country which has monarchy.

What is democracy?

- Democracy is a form of government in which the citizens are rules by an elected representative, and the powers of the leader are limited.

Why is Democracy necessary?

As we have seen that democracy is a form of government which gives freedom to its citizens in all aspects. I know that everything has its own pros and cons and so the democracy has but it provides us our rights and gives us the freedom for doing anything but only when we don't cross the limits of destroying someone else's rights. In here we are going to discuss why is democracy necessary?

Well it is necessary because it helps in a long run. Compared to some demerits it has many merits. Elections are held. It makes us choose our own representative. It provides the feeedom the citizens of the country need develop. It gives everyone an equal opportunity to stand in the election.

There is a leader in democracy too but it doesn't has that much power as the rulers in monarchy have . The leaders in democracy work as the serve taken of the citizens. They do what the citizens want and not according to their own wish. The leaders are never permanent they work only for the time period of five years.

When a leader in a democracy does something wrong we punish him by not voting him in the upcoming elections , and same happens when he or she doesn't works according to the wishes of the citizens.


It is important to live in democracy.

Pragya Sharma

Kerala School , R.K.puram , Delhi, India

Student : high school.

Views: 60

Tags: #essaycontest2018


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Gene Editing Governance & Dr. He Jiankui, with Jeffrey Kahn

Jeffrey Kahn, director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, discusses the many governance issues connected to gene editing. Plus, he gives a first-hand account of an historic conference in Hong Kong last year in which Dr. He Jiankui shared his research on the birth of the world's first germline genetically engineered babies. What's the future of the governance of this emerging technology?

Trump is the Symptom, Not the Problem

Astute observers of U.S. foreign policy have been making the case, as we move into the 2020 elections, not to see the interruptions in the flow of U.S. foreign policy solely as a result of the personality and foibles of the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, writes Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev. Ian Bremmer and Colin Dueck expand on this thought.

Gene Editing: Overview, Ethics, & the Near Future, with Robert Klitzman

In the first in a series of podcasts on gene editing, Columbia's Dr. Robert Klitzman provides an overview of the technology, ethical and governance issues, and where it could all go in the near future. Plus he explains why the birth of genetically engineered twins in China last year was a "seismic" event. How could gene editing lead to more inequality? What could be some of unintended consequences?





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.