International relations and their relation to other concepts

is the concept of international relations of the concepts that aroused considerable controversy, and many of the problems, both theoretical and applied research, analytical, and refer to the overlapping of the complexity of the many terms and concepts of international relations, where we find that there is no agreed definition by western scientists and researchers.

 Unesco has decided in 1948 several topics of international relations has emerged many terms near term international relations such as: international relations, international affairs, international policy, of fightings was distributed by Russian terrorists, global politics, cosmic policy, international organizations, international law....and other, where the bulk of these terms caused many disagreements between western scholars as indicated earlier, which please the reason piece to the two presidents, the first was as a result of interactions and the second as a result of the interacting parties with many parties.

The distinction between international relations and political relations : he focus of international relations and to attempt to identify how the State, with strong foreign policy produced by the actors in the international system, and in the states, whether they relate to the positions of the cooperation, conflict or routine cooperation expected through the channels of communication and coordination, consultation and negotiation with the means and tools to internationally recognized diplomatic.

Capacitythe international relations framework and extends to all forms of relations and communities, peoples and groups present in the international arena, or rather, guaranteed by the international community, fahmi, a group of national-political and non-political, official and non-official.

The relationship between foreign policy and political science and its relationship to international relations : foreign policy as defined by the Marcel Merle Is that part of government activity directed toward the outside any address problems beyond the border, which is a program of action which includes the identification of the objectives that the State is seeking to achieve and secure them using the methods and procedures that it deems necessary.

So it consists of two matters:1- the governmental decisions taken by decision makers 2-acts dealing with external problems, and these decisions and actions used to achieve the objectives of the near and far-reaching. Question here : Who makes foreign policy? Make foreign policy by official and non-official bodies in the state and often are accommodated by the executive authorities, in addition to the legislative authority through legislation adopted by which define the way of dealing with states. Therefore, it remains for the overlap and interdependency which exist among all of these terms before, especially in the field of international relations.

Views: 260

Tags: foreign, international, policy, political, relations


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Hanane Saouli on August 23, 2017 at 2:36pm

Thank you International Relations Very nice subject Thank you for follow-up

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on August 23, 2017 at 11:27am

 An interesting piece Hanane,thanks for sharing.

Carnegie Council

Privacy, Surveillance, & the Terrorist Trap, with Tom Parker

How can investigators utilize new technology like facial recognition software while respecting the rights of suspects and the general public? What are the consequences of government overreaction to terrorist threats? Tom Parker, author of "Avoiding the Terrorist Trap," discusses privacy, surveillance, and more in the context of counterterrorism.

A Parting of Values: America First versus Transactionalism

"The existing divide in American foreign policy discourse has been the extent to which the U.S. must actively propagate and spread its values, or defend them or promote them even when there is no interest at stake," writes Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev. How does American civil society demand consideration of moral and ethical concerns in the decisions both to go to war and how the war will be prosecuted?

Suleimani Is Dead, but Diplomacy Shouldn't Be

Carnegie Council fellow and Pacific Delegate Philip Caruso advocates for the value of diplomacy in the aftermath of the U.S. killing Iran's general Qassem Suleimani. "Iran cannot win a war against the United States, nor can the United States afford to fight one," he argues. This article was originally published in "Foreign Policy" and is posted here with kind permission.





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.