Integrating conflict and fragility in the post-2015 development framework: some recommendations

With the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015 and the time to set the new development agenda nearing, thematic consultations on the UN level are being held in 11 areas, Conflict and Fragility being one. The Conflict and Fragility cluster is co-convened by UNDP, UNICEF, UNPBSO and UNISDR in partnership with the Government of Finland. The following recommendations are made here for integrating conflict and fragility in the post-2015 development framework:

  • Integrate into the post-2015 development goals the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States adopted in Busan in 2011, identifying five Peacebuilding and Statebuilding Goals (PSGs) as guidance for engaging with developing fragile states;
  • Ensure that development aid channeled into rebuilding state institutions, and security sector reform, does not finance paramilitaries, organized crime groups, or terrorist networks;
  • Ensure that development aid does not finance violations of human rights and humanitarian law standards;
  • Encourage development aid donors and aid-recipient states to observe UN arms embargoes;
  • Encourage development aid donors and aid-recipient states to ratify the UN Arms Trade Treaty;
  • Encourage development aid donors to adopt legislation and concrete measures to reduce to a minimum arms exports to developing fragile or conflict states;
  • Ensure that all actors engaged in development in conflict or fragile states, which choose to contract private military or security companies, do so only according to the internationally recognized standards of The Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies, and in line with the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.

Views: 185

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

A Case for Giving Climate Migrants Protected Legal Status

With climate change already affecting vast regions of the planet, Bard College's Brian Mateo makes the case for expanding legal protections for refugees to include people displaced due to environmental issues. Whether by updating the 1951 Convention or working on a new global agreement, Mateo writes that this an urgent human rights issue for vulnerable populations today and future generations.

Need for a New Consensus

Foreign policy experts are having diffuclty linking the negative implications of a shift towards trasactionalism for U.S. foreign aid to voters. This begs the question: Should there be a clear quid pro quo for U.S. assistance?

The End of the U.S.-Taliban Talks? with Jonathan Cristol

Despite progress over the last year, Donald Trump effectively ended the latest round of U.S.-Taliban negotiations with a tweet earlier this month. Will talks continue in a more understated way? Does this change anything on the ground in Afghanistan? And what is the Taliban doing in Moscow? Jonathan Cristol, author of "The United States and the Taliban before and after 9/11," discusses all this and more.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.