Integrating conflict and fragility in the post-2015 development framework: some recommendations

With the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015 and the time to set the new development agenda nearing, thematic consultations on the UN level are being held in 11 areas, Conflict and Fragility being one. The Conflict and Fragility cluster is co-convened by UNDP, UNICEF, UNPBSO and UNISDR in partnership with the Government of Finland. The following recommendations are made here for integrating conflict and fragility in the post-2015 development framework:

  • Integrate into the post-2015 development goals the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States adopted in Busan in 2011, identifying five Peacebuilding and Statebuilding Goals (PSGs) as guidance for engaging with developing fragile states;
  • Ensure that development aid channeled into rebuilding state institutions, and security sector reform, does not finance paramilitaries, organized crime groups, or terrorist networks;
  • Ensure that development aid does not finance violations of human rights and humanitarian law standards;
  • Encourage development aid donors and aid-recipient states to observe UN arms embargoes;
  • Encourage development aid donors and aid-recipient states to ratify the UN Arms Trade Treaty;
  • Encourage development aid donors to adopt legislation and concrete measures to reduce to a minimum arms exports to developing fragile or conflict states;
  • Ensure that all actors engaged in development in conflict or fragile states, which choose to contract private military or security companies, do so only according to the internationally recognized standards of The Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies, and in line with the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers.

Views: 189

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?

Democratic Candidates & Foreign Policy after Iowa, with Nikolas Gvosdev

With the (incomplete) results of the Iowa Caucus putting the spotlight on Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, what do we know about their foreign policy platforms? How do they differentiate themselves from Joe Biden? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev shares his thoughts and touches on voters' possible perception of Sanders as a "socialist" and how climate change could become an issue in this election.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.