India Removes Special Status to Jammu & Kashmir by Scrapping Article 370 and 35 A of Constitution

How Pakistan and India's Opposition Political Parties are reacting on removal of Article 370 and 35 A

1- Chidambaram calls it monumental blunder.
2- Gulam Nabi Azad calls it Article was incorporated in presence of Sardar Patel.
3- Mehbooba says India has taken out Jinn from Bottle without knowing how to put it back in bottle.
4- PoK protests.
5- Pakistan Army calls an emergency meet tomorrow.
6- Pakistan calls special joint session of parliament tomorrow.

How India and ruling party is reacting-

1- Home Minister Amit Shah gives an impressive speech in parliament in favor of removal of Article 370 and 35 A

2- Rajya Sabha passes Jammu Kashmir Reservation Bill

3- Rajya Sabha passes Jammu Kashmir bifurcation bill dividing existing state in J & K and Laddakh. Both will be UNION Territories .

4- People are visiting this historic and decisive moment of constitutional history of India.

5- Jammu and Kashmir were annexed to India through a written agreement between Maharaja Hari Singh and then Indian Prime Minister Pt Jawahar Lal Nehru.

6-Article 370 which was added in constitution by constituent assembly on November 25,1949 grants special status to J & K where Central Government can not intervene in J & K Affairs except in few portfolios and matters like defense and finance while 35 A which was added as a Presidential Order in 1954 gives special provision to residents of J & K.

7- Many believe that Article 370 and 35 A are reasons behind corruption,terrorism and two flags,two constitution and two political heads in India.

Views: 28


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The Ethics of Trade with China and Authoritarian Upgrading

Increased foreign investment and engagement is producing, not democratization, but "authoritarian upgrading," where selected reforms are designed to legitimize a softer authoritarianism. This presents an ethical dilemma for international trade. What direction will China, Uzbekistan, Russia, and other "upgraded authoritarian" states evolve towards in the coming decade?

The 2020 Election & the View from Overseas, with Nikolas Gvosdev

As the 2020 election begins to come into focus, Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev details the foreign policy cleavages in the Democratic Party. Plus, referencing Nahal Toosi's recent article in "Politico," he discusses the worries that many in Europe have about a Trump reelection or a progressive candidate who also questions the status quo. What's the view from abroad on this turbulent time in American politics?

Ethics & the U.S.-China Trade War, with Nikolas Gvosdev

What role should ethics play in the U.S.-China trade war? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev looks at these economic tensions in the context of the Uyghur detention and the Hong Kong protests, different theories on integrating China into the world economy, and what it could mean to "lose" in this conflict. Is there a breaking point in terms of China's human rights policies? What's the view in Africa and Europe?





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.