India Removes Special Status to Jammu & Kashmir by Scrapping Article 370 and 35 A of Constitution

How Pakistan and India's Opposition Political Parties are reacting on removal of Article 370 and 35 A

1- Chidambaram calls it monumental blunder.
2- Gulam Nabi Azad calls it Article was incorporated in presence of Sardar Patel.
3- Mehbooba says India has taken out Jinn from Bottle without knowing how to put it back in bottle.
4- PoK protests.
5- Pakistan Army calls an emergency meet tomorrow.
6- Pakistan calls special joint session of parliament tomorrow.

How India and ruling party is reacting-

1- Home Minister Amit Shah gives an impressive speech in parliament in favor of removal of Article 370 and 35 A

2- Rajya Sabha passes Jammu Kashmir Reservation Bill

3- Rajya Sabha passes Jammu Kashmir bifurcation bill dividing existing state in J & K and Laddakh. Both will be UNION Territories .

4- People are visiting this historic and decisive moment of constitutional history of India.

5- Jammu and Kashmir were annexed to India through a written agreement between Maharaja Hari Singh and then Indian Prime Minister Pt Jawahar Lal Nehru.

6-Article 370 which was added in constitution by constituent assembly on November 25,1949 grants special status to J & K where Central Government can not intervene in J & K Affairs except in few portfolios and matters like defense and finance while 35 A which was added as a Presidential Order in 1954 gives special provision to residents of J & K.

7- Many believe that Article 370 and 35 A are reasons behind corruption,terrorism and two flags,two constitution and two political heads in India.

Views: 50


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The Future of Artificial Intelligence, with Stuart J. Russell

UC Berkley's Professor Stuart J. Russell discusses the near- and far-future of artificial intelligence, including self-driving cars, killer robots, governance, and why he's worried that AI might destroy the world. How can scientists reconfigure AI systems so that humans will always be in control? How can we govern this emerging technology across borders? What can be done if autonomous weapons are deployed in 2020?

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.