Global Ethics and the Effective Parliamentarian

October 16th marks the inaugural Global Ethics Day—a day spearheaded by the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs on the occasion of their centennial celebrations. When I first learned of the day, I immediately turned my thoughts to ethics in politics. As a program advisor at the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption (GOPAC), when I think of questions of ethics I am inevitably drawn back to issues of corruption. Ethics is vital to the work of parliamentarians and crucial to functioning democracy. Without ethics the entire infrastructure of democratic institutions falls apart.

Picture the following scenario. A legislator is a member of a committee that is overseeing the spending on a major public infrastructure project that involves a multi-million dollar budget and a long-term planning horizon. The legislator frequently receives guests in his constituency office to discuss matters of concern. Throughout the parliamentary session, the legislator receives repeated visits from senior management of a construction company bidding for the very same building project for which the legislator is charged with providing oversight. The legislator succumbs to the pressures of the lobbyists and begins to make decisions and offer advice in committee that would be favourable to the construction company bidding on the public infrastructure deal. Unknown to the legislator, certain members of the senior management team with which meetings were being held are part of a criminal organization that has illegally financed the political campaign of a colleague and has offered to do the same, in the lead up to the next election, for the legislator in question.

How does democracy look now?

When revelations of corrupt and unethical behaviour surface, on the part of public officials or parliamentarians, it has a direct impact on the democratic process. Trust and integrity are difficult to acquire, easily lost, and even more difficult to regain. The effectiveness of a parliamentarian is directly correlated to his or her ethical standing and capabilities.

In light of the importance that ethics plays in the work of parliamentarians, I was led to explore how parliamentarians in their work of serving a greater good are in essence actual “common goods”. I was intrigued by the notion that something as precious and yet often misunderstood as the legislature, a democratic institution, could succumb to the very same tragedy that other “goods”, e.g. natural resources or common land, could be made to suffer. That is, the “tragedy of the commons” or abuse of something held in common interest.

Sure, parliamentarians are not your typical example of common property. I do not know of any self-respecting politician who would agree with the notion that they are actually, physically the property of others. However, from a philosophical and institutional perspective, I would hope that my own member of parliament would see that they are part of something bigger. A legislature is a sort of “institutional commons”. Therefore, it should be protected in the same way one would protect against the abuse of other commonly held resources.

Without the proper ethics and conduct regimes in place, parliamentarians are susceptible to the very same mistakes anyone could make if constantly under pressure from multiple interest groups and lobbyists. In my experience most parliamentarians are fully conscious of the public trust they hold and the responsibilities of their position. However, it is always easier to maintain one’s integrity when there is a clear map to follow. This is particularly true of professions that frequently involve the treading of unchartered waters.

Parliamentarians need to build and safeguard strong and clear rules on conflicts of interest, in parliamentary ethics and conduct regimes. This goes to the heart of advancing the integrity of democratic institutions and protecting the greater good, the common good.

------------------

Jean Pierre Chabot is a Program Advisor at the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption (GOPAC). He recently authored a GOPAC position paper titled Preventing a Tragedy of the Commons.

Views: 233

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Jean Pierre Chabot on October 20, 2014 at 11:42am

Thank you for the feedback on the post Valentine. I agree wholeheartedly with your comment. Regards.

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on October 20, 2014 at 11:33am

Thanks for sharing MR.Chabot. To have a sustainable democratic institution, there is need for public morality by all stakeholders in order to actualize our full humanness and civilization

Carnegie Council

How Change Happens, with Cass Sunstein

How does change happen? How and why do some social movements take off, from the French Revolution to #MeToo? In a book that was 25 years in the making, Cass Sunstein unpacks this puzzle by exploring the interplay of three decisive factors. Don't miss this insightful talk. It may change how you view the world.

Human Rights, Liberalism, & Ordinary Virtues, with Michael Ignatieff

Central European University's President Michael Ignatieff is a human rights scholar, an educator, a former politician, and, as he tells us, the son of a refugee. He discusses what he calls "the ordinary virtues," such as patience and tolerance; the status of human rights today and the dilemmas of migration; the essential critera for true democracy; and the ideal curriculum. His advice to students: Learn to think for yourself.

Ethics and Climate Change: Earth Day 2019

In honor of Earth Day, April 22, 2019, Carnegie Council presents a selection of materials from the past year on the ethical responsibilities and challenges of coping with climate change.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.