As we all know, the technology nowadays are ever expanding at an exponential rate. What we may just think of something today, may already be prototype and optimized by tomorrow.The instruments to make anything is almost limitless; from ubiquitous DIY material to 3D printer. Like they say, the Sky's the limit.

However, there's a possibility that a threat may come upon us. A threat of "privacy invasion". 

Well, what I'm thinking is not about the internet, but the future of it.

Let me give an example of what future of internet could be, from my perspective. In future, all of us would have a "digital sign" whether we want it or not. This digital sign could be a replacement to our physical identification card. This digital sign would enable one to detect one's present even in camera. So, it's like a "Big Brother" is watching us, 24/7 .

But then again, this is not the cyber invasion that I thinking of...

The introduction of this digital sign would be lucrative for the business world. Since the digital sign would readily identified our face, body and even our personal ailments, there is a use for that in the marketing world.

In future, there will be NO models working to promote product (sorry!). so, who's going to publicize the market product?

Well, they have YOU.

Imagine this, the advertising board will have and digital sign identifier. So whenever someone close by, the board will show the closer-by people wearing/using the product. An Innovative way to capture and persuade customer to buy their product.

BUT, then again, does this not against one's personal privacy? 

What if the person does not like others to see them in plain clothes or vice-verse? What if the person is bound to religious belief that abhorred act of "revealing" body to anybody?

This will be a question to ponder about when we imagine the future of things..

Views: 156

Tags: #Cyber, #privacy, digital, hadi, imagine, marketing, product, sign

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Al LeBlanc on January 29, 2015 at 9:57am

IMO, Urgently Need International CyberPrivacyCode of Ethics and Personal Empowerment of UsAll Users to Audit our On-line Personal Identity Data and collected Meta-Data.  Our every cyber transmittal is being collected and tracked in BigData, even our location movement.  Enough Already - We Need access to our publicly available data, tracking sites, et al  and be able to audit/control/delete our on line personal/private data. 

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on January 22, 2015 at 9:42am

I Think the Idea of personal privacy is a function of value. Our values today are being shaped , re-shaped and altered  as the case may be by the ever prevailing technological advancement of out time. Consequently and perhaps,the hitherto "personal privacy" may metamorphosed to "public or general privacy" in this situation , Our values would have shifted from what we see as personal to public. Mankind is value oriented and this  value can change when contextualized within the business, personal, educational, family lifestyle, taste and what have you domains.

Carnegie Council

The Individual & the Collective, Politics, & the UN, with Jean-Marie Guéhenno

Carnegie Council Senior Fellow Jean-Marie Guéhenno, former head of United Nations peacekeeping operations, discusses the tensions between the individual and the collective in a world filled with political tension, pervasive surveillance, and fear of risk. What is the role of the UN in this environment? How can we avoid the violent upheavals that marked other transitional phases in humanity?

A Russian Take on the Kurds and U.S. Foreign Policy

A Russian defense news site declared the United States an "unreliable ally" after the the withdrawal of American troops from Northern Syria. Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev connects this characterization to the need for leaders to connect a specific policy action to a larger, understandable narrative for the American public.

The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations, with Michelle Murray

How can established powers manage the peaceful rise of new great powers? Bard's Michelle Murray offers a new answer to this perennial question, arguing that power transitions are principally social phenomena whereby rising powers struggle to obtain recognition as world powers. How can this framework help us to understand the economic and military rivalry between United States and China?

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.