#Cyberpeacefre Value Engineering Approach


The Value Engineering Approach (VE)  is also based on Function (like systems approach), although more narrowly than a system perspective which spans the universe e.g., "galactic  system" The basic  VE formula is:


  Vmax = required function/minimum cost (required function divided by minumun cost)

An extreme example of VE approach is a necktie clip.  Think ! What would be a max value necktie clip ?

The VE approach requires knowledge of materials and manufacturing processes for making things, which Value Engineers have to research/cooperate with others with such knowledge.

As the USAF/Office of Aerospace Research Value Engineer, I was the focal point for VE and involved in actually doing VE on different projects. Without getting into a myriad of details, let me stress that the necktie clip is an illustration of the concept and not a "real world/marketable solution". The answer to max value necktie clip is a "paper clip".

Let's take our Systems Approach "coffee mug" example. Most people would probably think of a styrofoam throughaway coffee cup as a Vmax solution. However, most users  (including me) wouldn't enjoy regularly drinking from such a cup. So I wouldn't buy such a cup for normal/enjoyable usage. My value engineered coffee cup is a solid cream  cup with a comfortable handle and solid base which is re-usable ad infinitum.

What would be a Vmax solution to Cyberpeacefare's Systems Objective Function: "World Peace and Planet Survival ?


Views: 88

Tags: #cyberpeacefare, #systems, #value, approach, engineering


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The End of the U.S.-Taliban Talks? with Jonathan Cristol

Despite progress over the last year, Donald Trump effectively ended the latest round of U.S.-Taliban negotiations with a tweet earlier this month. Will talks continue in a more understated way? Does this change anything on the ground in Afghanistan? And what is the Taliban doing in Moscow? Jonathan Cristol, author of "The United States and the Taliban before and after 9/11," discusses all this and more.

Candidates, Calculus, and the Iran Crisis

In choosing whether and how to respond to the attack on Saudi Arabian oil refineries, what is the calculus for determining action? Should the United States maintain its status as the guarantor of the Persian Gulf, protecting the security and integrity of the international energy system? What do the 2020 candidates think?

The Narrative IS Changing . . .

The narrative about America's role in the world is changing--and more evidence is accumulating that suggests that no matter how the 2020 presidential and congressional elections turn out, there is no turning the clock back to a pre-2016 status quo.





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.