#Cyberpeacefare #Peace #Morals #EverybodyAnybody/Somebody/Nobody ? #Cybersilence
"The great task of peace is to work morals into it. The only sort of peace that will be real is one in which everybody takes his share of responsibility. World organizations and conferences will be of no value unless there is improvement in the relation of men to men."
Sir Frederick Eggleston
(Peace is UpU&Me/UsAll. So Few "take share of responsibility". "We are the world - Let's make it better" cybersilence ?).
Comment
-
Comment by Al LeBlanc on July 3, 2014 at 9:32am
-
I Fully Agree with Sir Frederick Eggleston, " ....IN WHICH EVERYBODY TAKES HIS SHARE OF RESPONSIBILITY" Pope Francis is trying, Carnegie is trying, Global Zero is trying,....et al .
We All Need to be Outraged with the Insane Terrorism going on in the world - DARE TO CARE !
#Cyberpeacefare Gadfly
d
-
Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on June 5, 2014 at 1:32pm
-
That is very right Mr Al,I quite agree with you.
-
-
Interesting Observation ! Received an e-mail from Carnegie on massive sample experiment (n=689,003) on Facebook that "emotional contagion can be transferred without peoples' awareness and direct interaction". Suggest your point "cybersilence therefore, should not be taken as synonymous with indolence of the mind." How do you motivate a moment of social media "courage as small a a mustard seed" to initiate Universal Peace Uprising/tsunami ? Meditation/conscience transference/telepathy ?
-
-
Improving men to men relations through cyber peacefare may not be an understatement if we pigeonholed the phenomenon in micro digital social process sustained by technology.Cybersilence therefore, should not be taken as synonymous with indolence of the mind.However, what is critical is just a little courage as small as a mustard seed by humanity;a moral imperative for task accomplishment and discharge of moral obligations
Top Content
Carnegie Council
Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency, with Larry Diamond
Larry Diamond's core argument is stark: the defense and advancement of democratic ideals relies on U.S. global leadership. If the U.S. does not reclaim its traditional place as the keystone of democracy, today's authoritarian trend could become a tsunami that could provide an opening for Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and their admirers to turn the 21st century into a dark time of surging authoritarianism.Global Ethics Weekly: Foreign Policy & the 2020 Democratic Candidates, with Nikolas Gvosdev
Will Joe Biden's "restorationist" foreign policy resonate with voters? What would a "progressive" approach to international relations look like for Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? What role will foreign policy play in the 2020 Election? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev looks at these questions and more as he and host Alex Woodson discuss a crowded 2020 Democratic primary field.The Crack-Up: A Hundred Years of Student Protests in China, with Jeffrey Wasserstrom
In the latest "Crack-Up" podcast, China expert Jeffrey Wasserstrom discusses the rich history of Chinese student protests. From the May Fourth movement in 1919 to Tiananmen Square in 1989 to today's mass demonstrations in Hong Kong, what are the threads that tie these moments together? Don't miss this fascinating talk, which also touches on Woodrow Wilson, the Russian Revolution, and a young Mao Zedong.SUBSCRIBE TODAY
VIDEOS
SUPPORT US
GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS
© 2019 Created by Carnegie Council.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!
Join Global Ethics Network