#Cyberpeacefare #Initial System Concept #Feasibility Study

1.0 CYBERPEACEFARE INITIAL SYSTEM CONCEPT

1.1 System Objective Function: World Peace and Planet Survival

1.2 Primary Requirement: Needs Generate Sufficient Potential/Critical Mass for Universal Cyber Peace Uprising/Tsunami.

2.0 SYSTEM SYNTHESIS

2.1 System Backbone: World-Wide Web: Social Media Sites, International/National/Non-Government Organizations/Individual Blogs

2.2 Central Processing Center: Management/Correlation/Augmentation/Synchronization/Messaging

3.0 ORGANIZATIONAL

3.1 Management Steering Group: Carnegie (Proposed Chairman), Selected Peace Organizations/Blogs, Social Media Entrepreneurs, Partner Philanthropists

3.2 Executive Working Group/System Program Office.

(Proposed Discussion Strawman/Feasibility Study. Any Feedback ?  Al)

Views: 254

Tags: #Cberpeacefare, #Feasibility, Study

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Lydia Kaplan on January 27, 2015 at 6:11pm

Very creative!

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 10:10am

Need "win hearts and minds" though internet grid peace tsunami ? (Imagine analogy of electrical grid power surge when demand for peace power needed, around the world, especially in the Middle East ?

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 9:45am

Cyberpeacepower Grid needed for worldpeace tsunami ? 

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 7:31am

Imagine !  Each world peace planet survival organizations/blogs (includes Nuclear Reduction/Elimination as well as Environmental advocates): Government/NGOs/International/UN, et al were internet connected like an electrical grid, where each power station/dynamos could surge their resources for a common calamity e.g., Syria, Iraq, Middle East Peace,et al - #cyberpeacefare ?

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 22, 2014 at 11:55am

Seems to me Carnegie's outstanding 100-year track record in advocating "world peace and planet survival " and wiring/interconnections with a grid of  leading national/international - n0n-governmental/governmental organizations places it in a unique leadership position.

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on June 12, 2014 at 3:02pm

Cyberpeacefare a system concept of a life time......A plus feasibility remark.

Carnegie Council

The Power of Tribalism, with Amy Chua & Walter Russell Mead

"In our foreign policy, for at least half a century, we have been spectacularly blind to the power of tribal politics," says Amy Chua, author of "Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations." What does this mean in 2019? How can Americans move past tribalism? Don't miss this conversation with Chua and Bard College's Walter Russell Mead, moderated by Bard's Roger Berkowitz.

Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics, & Political Responsibility, with Stephen Gardiner

University of Washington's Professor Stephen Gardiner discusses the ethics of climate change from intergenerational, political, and personal perspectives. Should individuals feel bad for using plastic straws or eating meat? What should the UN and its member states do? And how can older generations make up for "a massive failure in leadership" that has led, in part, to the current crisis?

C2G Update: Nature-based Solutions, the UN, & the IPCC Reports, with Janos Pasztor

Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G), gives an update on his team's work after a busy week in New York. In the wake of troubling IPCC reports on climate change's effect on the oceans and land use, what more can the UN do? What are the challenges of nature-based solutions? And how should we handle climate change fatigue, individually and on a societal level?

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.