#Cyberpeacefare #Initial System Concept #Feasibility Study

1.0 CYBERPEACEFARE INITIAL SYSTEM CONCEPT

1.1 System Objective Function: World Peace and Planet Survival

1.2 Primary Requirement: Needs Generate Sufficient Potential/Critical Mass for Universal Cyber Peace Uprising/Tsunami.

2.0 SYSTEM SYNTHESIS

2.1 System Backbone: World-Wide Web: Social Media Sites, International/National/Non-Government Organizations/Individual Blogs

2.2 Central Processing Center: Management/Correlation/Augmentation/Synchronization/Messaging

3.0 ORGANIZATIONAL

3.1 Management Steering Group: Carnegie (Proposed Chairman), Selected Peace Organizations/Blogs, Social Media Entrepreneurs, Partner Philanthropists

3.2 Executive Working Group/System Program Office.

(Proposed Discussion Strawman/Feasibility Study. Any Feedback ?  Al)

Views: 250

Tags: #Cberpeacefare, #Feasibility, Study

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Lydia Kaplan on January 27, 2015 at 6:11pm

Very creative!

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 10:10am

Need "win hearts and minds" though internet grid peace tsunami ? (Imagine analogy of electrical grid power surge when demand for peace power needed, around the world, especially in the Middle East ?

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 9:45am

Cyberpeacepower Grid needed for worldpeace tsunami ? 

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 24, 2014 at 7:31am

Imagine !  Each world peace planet survival organizations/blogs (includes Nuclear Reduction/Elimination as well as Environmental advocates): Government/NGOs/International/UN, et al were internet connected like an electrical grid, where each power station/dynamos could surge their resources for a common calamity e.g., Syria, Iraq, Middle East Peace,et al - #cyberpeacefare ?

Comment by Al LeBlanc on June 22, 2014 at 11:55am

Seems to me Carnegie's outstanding 100-year track record in advocating "world peace and planet survival " and wiring/interconnections with a grid of  leading national/international - n0n-governmental/governmental organizations places it in a unique leadership position.

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on June 12, 2014 at 3:02pm

Cyberpeacefare a system concept of a life time......A plus feasibility remark.

Carnegie Council

Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency, with Larry Diamond

Larry Diamond's core argument is stark: the defense and advancement of democratic ideals relies on U.S. global leadership. If the U.S. does not reclaim its traditional place as the keystone of democracy, today's authoritarian trend could become a tsunami that could provide an opening for Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and their admirers to turn the 21st century into a dark time of surging authoritarianism.

Global Ethics Weekly: Foreign Policy & the 2020 Democratic Candidates, with Nikolas Gvosdev

Will Joe Biden's "restorationist" foreign policy resonate with voters? What would a "progressive" approach to international relations look like for Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? What role will foreign policy play in the 2020 Election? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev looks at these questions and more as he and host Alex Woodson discuss a crowded 2020 Democratic primary field.

The Crack-Up: A Hundred Years of Student Protests in China, with Jeffrey Wasserstrom

In the latest "Crack-Up" podcast, China expert Jeffrey Wasserstrom discusses the rich history of Chinese student protests. From the May Fourth movement in 1919 to Tiananmen Square in 1989 to today's mass demonstrations in Hong Kong, what are the threads that tie these moments together? Don't miss this fascinating talk, which also touches on Woodrow Wilson, the Russian Revolution, and a young Mao Zedong.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.