I am that I am.I 

I am a believer in the power of ideas and the personal cyber power(pcp) of  individuals  "for good  as well as evil" on the world-wide web/social media, e.g., cyberpeacefare/cyberwarfare.

I am a preacher that National Security in the current multi-power-multi-domain competitive age requires citizen participation and support for peace, as well as war; especially, when considering the 5th cyber domain of warfare (land, sea, air, space cyber); "World Peace and Planet Survival" is the system objective function of #Cyberpeacefare.  

I am an recruiter of Earth Stakeholder/ Citizens to make their voices resonate "bottom up" in the world-wide cyber domain; "let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me." Enough Indifference - You can make a little difference and Help Initiate a CyberWorldPeaceTsunami ("butterfly effect"/chaos theory).

 Might you join in this cyber experiment and become a cyber peace citizen.by adding your thoughts/ideas/ affirmations/feedback to this strawman affirmations of your beliefs on use of the cyber domain for #cyberpeacefare ?  

CyberPeaceGadfly/AL

Views: 33

Tags: #Cyberpeacefare, #I, Am, I, That

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Privacy, Surveillance, & the Terrorist Trap, with Tom Parker

How can investigators utilize new technology like facial recognition software while respecting the rights of suspects and the general public? What are the consequences of government overreaction to terrorist threats? Tom Parker, author of "Avoiding the Terrorist Trap," discusses privacy, surveillance, and more in the context of counterterrorism.

A Parting of Values: America First versus Transactionalism

"The existing divide in American foreign policy discourse has been the extent to which the U.S. must actively propagate and spread its values, or defend them or promote them even when there is no interest at stake," writes Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev. How does American civil society demand consideration of moral and ethical concerns in the decisions both to go to war and how the war will be prosecuted?

Suleimani Is Dead, but Diplomacy Shouldn't Be

Carnegie Council fellow and Pacific Delegate Philip Caruso advocates for the value of diplomacy in the aftermath of the U.S. killing Iran's general Qassem Suleimani. "Iran cannot win a war against the United States, nor can the United States afford to fight one," he argues. This article was originally published in "Foreign Policy" and is posted here with kind permission.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.