#Cyberpeacefare #Goodness #Quote Oliver Goldsmith

"Whatever mitigates the woes, or increases the happiness of others, is a just criterion of goodness;and whatever injures society at large, or any individual in it is a criterion of iniquity." Oliver Goldsmith

good: 1. Being positive or desirable in nature; not bad or poor; a good experience;good news 2.a. Having the qualities that are desirable or distinguishing in a particular thing; a good exterior paint; a good job b. Serving the desired purpose or end; superior to the average; a good student; valid or true, a good reason. no good: worthless, futile,useless; it's no good arguing with them.........

iniquity: 1. gross immorality or injustice; wickedness 2. a grossly immoral act; a sin.

(American Heritage Dictionary)

Seems to me "us/all" should try a little to do a good deed for "world peace and planet survival"

"today, today, today"     Al

Views: 170

Tags: #Goodness, #Today, #cyberpeacefare


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Al LeBlanc on November 5, 2014 at 12:38pm

Joseph:  Thanks for your contribution !  We finally agree !  Al

Comment by Joseph Peppe, ND on November 5, 2014 at 12:28pm

3 John 1:11► "Beloved, don't imitate that which is evil, but that which is good. He who does good is of God. He who does evil hasn't seen God." 

Comment by Al LeBlanc on November 5, 2014 at 11:54am

Valentine:  Couldn't Agree More !!  Al

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on November 5, 2014 at 11:49am

Good and iniquity are diametrically opposing. But, the latter is amoral; Good deed to World Peace and Planet Survival should be our mantra today, tomorrow and forever.

Carnegie Council

The Future of Artificial Intelligence, with Stuart J. Russell

UC Berkley's Professor Stuart J. Russell discusses the near- and far-future of artificial intelligence, including self-driving cars, killer robots, governance, and why he's worried that AI might destroy the world. How can scientists reconfigure AI systems so that humans will always be in control? How can we govern this emerging technology across borders? What can be done if autonomous weapons are deployed in 2020?

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.