#Cyberpeacefare #General Theory of Cyberpeacefare

Seems to me that there is an Urgent  Need for a General Theory of Cyberpeacefare (akin to Einstein General Theory of Relativity) which is acceptable behavior for us/all (individuals/ethnic-religious groups/nation states/et al).  Given the "Golden Rule" as the General Law, the world-wide web as the systematic means, what motive force(s) required to stimulate consciences - u&me/usall to  realize/exercise our PersonalCyberPower for "world peace and planet survival". CyberPeaceGadfly

(To a "independent-unbiased observer" using the Golden Rule as the Gold Standard - who are the terrorists ?  Are we all Hypocrites to a greater or lesser magnitude. To what extent does the analogy of Newton's Law that "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" apply to human affairs ?.Seems to me ChaosTheory/"butterfly effect" applies to "hypocritical minds" causing unnecessary wars ?  Hypocrisy: the practice of professing beliefs, feelings or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness; an act or instance of falseness (AmericanHeritageDictionary)

Views: 67

Tags: #Cyberpeacefare, #General, #Humanity, Theory, UsAll

Comment

You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Ethics & the U.S.-China Trade War, with Nikolas Gvosdev

What role should ethics play in the U.S.-China trade war? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev looks at these economic tensions in the context of the Uyghur detention and the Hong Kong protests, different theories on integrating China into the world economy, and what it could mean to "lose" in this conflict. Is there a breaking point in terms of China's human rights policies? What's the view in Africa and Europe?

Ethical Considerations in a Trade War with China

Are there ethical considerations that need to be factored in as part of assessing the merits of a "trade war" with the People's Republic of China?

Beyond Trump

Some countries are now coming to the same conclusions reached by the U.S. Global Engagement program: the 2016 election was not a "blip," but represents a break with the past. "In other words, no foreign government should bank on getting a better shake post-Trump."

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

VIDEOS

SUPPORT US

GEO-GOVERNANCE MATTERS

© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service


The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.