#Cyberpeacefare Fleeting Moments/Opportunities/DataInundation

It seems to me, a cyberpeacecitizen, that many important fleeting messages/expositions on "world peace and planet survival" are lost or "deadended" in social media because of fleeting opportunity of conscientious instant action or just "indifference" of fellow citizens of the world to re-tweet/comment ?

Further, the deluge of social media data from millions/billions of sources requires collaboration/ synchronicity of sources to achieve most important messages going viral.  What seems to go viral are "Hollywood Celebrities" ?

CheckOut Cyberpeacefare - would appreciate members' views on "how to get a Universal Peace Uprising ?


Views: 118

Tags: #CyberPeaceCitizen, #Cyberpeacefare, #Universal, Peace, Uprising


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Valentine Olushola Oyedipe on December 31, 2013 at 9:25am

The move towards World Peace and Planet Survival (WPPS) should be rooted in both the object and subject of virility. The Hollywood celebrities are only conspicuous at the objective lens of virility. At the subjective lens virility, every man, every woman, every child and all humankind become conspicuous. Thus, the weapon of our warfare should be a two edged sword that will cut at the objective and the subjective levels of virility. This presupposes that re-tweeting our moral conscience in accordance with virtues at individual level will without gainsaying provide a palatable moral/ethical platform as anti-viral to viral social actions that are objectively institutionalized as found expression in the Hollywood industry. However, our personal Hollywood that is, our conscience (the industry of thoughts and actions) where series of goal purposive and directional actions exude must be morally infused with virtues to bring about universal peace uprising, be it at the positive peace or negative realms of peace. The interrogation at the objective and the objective levels should form the basis for our synchronicity and collaboration as in re-tweeting and passing comments.

Comment by Ephraim Akenzua on December 29, 2013 at 3:09pm
Yes Al, Hollywood celebrities!
Alas, this development (turn out of event) indeed has eviscerated and to some degree made a mincemeat of the applaudable and conscientious endeavours so far by some altruistic an social-centric elements (like yourself Al) for "world peace and planet survival".
It thus becomes pertinent and quintessential for underscoring such initiatives like "cyberpeacecafare" and the likes, that tend to elicit necessary re-tweet/coment to this effect.

Carnegie Council

A Case for Giving Climate Migrants Protected Legal Status

With climate change already affecting vast regions of the planet, Bard College's Brian Mateo makes the case for expanding legal protections for refugees to include people displaced due to environmental issues. Whether by updating the 1951 Convention or working on a new global agreement, Mateo writes that this an urgent human rights issue for vulnerable populations today and future generations.

Need for a New Consensus

Foreign policy experts are having diffuclty linking the negative implications of a shift towards trasactionalism for U.S. foreign aid to voters. This begs the question: Should there be a clear quid pro quo for U.S. assistance?

The End of the U.S.-Taliban Talks? with Jonathan Cristol

Despite progress over the last year, Donald Trump effectively ended the latest round of U.S.-Taliban negotiations with a tweet earlier this month. Will talks continue in a more understated way? Does this change anything on the ground in Afghanistan? And what is the Taliban doing in Moscow? Jonathan Cristol, author of "The United States and the Taliban before and after 9/11," discusses all this and more.





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.