#Cyberpeacefare Brainstorming Help Needed !

Fellow Members:

Objective of Cyberpeacefare is to enable/facilitate individuals/organizations/us-all" using world-wide web/social media- to stand up and make our individual voices resonate around cyberspace for "world peace and planet survival." Like a "journey starts with a single step" and "a butterfly flapping its wings can cause a tsunami", a single initial tweet can start a cyberworldpeceuprising, provided the initiating tweet(s) are simply re-broadcast.

Need your "brainstorm/top of head/uncensored ideas" why people aren't realizing the power and moral opportunity they possess to cause a peace tsunami. Why the Indifference ?  Most important, what are your ideas for proposed solution to the problem?

"We are the world" - "Let's Make It Better"  - "UpU&MEUsAll


Views: 94


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Comment by Al LeBlanc on January 23, 2014 at 9:06pm

In a conversation I had with a good friend, he asked me whether I was active on Facebook.  I told him I was spending more time on Global Ethics Network and Twitter.  He mentioned he saw my Cyberpeacefare Blog but didn't get involved in such things. I didn't pursue the subject that an individual, can make a minor contribution which if multiplied can cause a  chain reaction/tsunami.

The problem, in my opinion, is a belief that "I" cannot make a difference (indifference). People don't realize the power that they individually possess through world-wide web/social media collective action.  A secondary problem is NIH (not invented here).

Anybody got any thoughts on the subject ?


Carnegie Council

A Case for Giving Climate Migrants Protected Legal Status

With climate change already affecting vast regions of the planet, Bard College's Brian Mateo makes the case for expanding legal protections for refugees to include people displaced due to environmental issues. Whether by updating the 1951 Convention or working on a new global agreement, Mateo writes that this an urgent human rights issue for vulnerable populations today and future generations.

Need for a New Consensus

Foreign policy experts are having diffuclty linking the negative implications of a shift towards trasactionalism for U.S. foreign aid to voters. This begs the question: Should there be a clear quid pro quo for U.S. assistance?

The End of the U.S.-Taliban Talks? with Jonathan Cristol

Despite progress over the last year, Donald Trump effectively ended the latest round of U.S.-Taliban negotiations with a tweet earlier this month. Will talks continue in a more understated way? Does this change anything on the ground in Afghanistan? And what is the Taliban doing in Moscow? Jonathan Cristol, author of "The United States and the Taliban before and after 9/11," discusses all this and more.





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.