Could our new global ethic come from...Afghanistan?

Originally posted on

A fierce young hunter throttles a lion using a single wooden rod.  Ashoka, the ancient revered ruler of the Maurya Dynasty, possessed a formidable temper from an early age.  Legend has it that Ashoka, in a ruthless ploy for power, got rid of the legitimate heir to the throne by tricking him into entering a pit filled with live coals.  Other legends hold that Ashoka submitted his ministers to brutal tests of loyalty, ordering 500 of them killed upon failure.

Ashoka proved to be a ruler of great conquest, significantly expanding his empire's reach during his almost 40 year reign.  However, at the apex of the empire's expansion, Ashoka's moral foundation was shattered by the very destruction his empire wrought.  A brutal defeat of the Kalingua state left the valley beneath Dhauli Hill in Southeastern Asia soaked in blood and littered with the mangled bone and tissue of 100,000 humans.1

It was at this moment that Ashoka uttered his famous lament asking, "What have I done?  If this is a victory, what's a defeat then?  Is this a victory or a defeat?  Is this justice or injustice?  Is it gallantry or a rout?  Is it valor to kill innocent children and women?  Did I do it to widen the empire and for prosperity or to destroy the other's kingdom and splendor?  One has lost her husband, someone else a father, someone a child, someone an unborn infant."2

If this is a victory, what's a defeat then? - Ashoka

Ashoka, struck by an ethical tidal wave, restructured his empire around the humane treatment of all sentient beings.  His reformation, aided by Buddhist principles, prompted exceedingly progressive measures such as "provisions for medical treatment of humans and animals."3 Additionally, he had "wells dug and trees planted along the roads for the benefit of the common people."3

Ashoka's story is relevant for its geography alone.  The Mauryan Empire, stretching from present-day Afghanistan deep into southern India and east to modern-day Bangladesh, was firmly rooted in Afghanistan.  For many, Afghanistan symbolizes the hatred and terrorism that has exacerbated the growing cynicism of the 21st century.  This cynicism is especially apparent within the primarily Christian confines of America, where it is the belief of many that peace will not arrive in the Middle East until the return of Christ.  This belief, along with the ever-growing carnage, has made many eternally pessimistic towards the region.  Ashoka's ancient ethical revelation offers hope and proof that the Middle East and its people are not inherently violent and hateful.

More broadly speaking, Ashoka's story is of a far-flung empire of disparate cultures moving towards a guiding ethic centered around compassion and equality.  His story is particularly motivating within the context of our global community. A community guided by an international economy primarily thirsty for growth in areas like overall GDP and per capita income.  A world community numb to widening income inequality and a shriveling environment.  "Progress", at the expense of our planet and those unable to help themselves, can only be checked by an Ashokan-like change of heart.

1. Jerry Bentley, Old World Encounters: Cross-Cultural Contacts and Exchanges in Pre-Modern Times (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 45.

2.  Kamath, Prabhakar. "How Ashoka the Great Gave Brahmins A Song With Which They Conquere.... Nirmukta.

3.  The Edicts of King Ashoka, English translation (1993) by Ven. S. Dhammika. ISBN 955-24-0104-6. Retrieved on: 2009-02-21

Views: 284


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Solar Dominance + Citizen Action: Solving Climate Change By 2030, with Eban Goodstein

Can new developments in solar technology put the United States on track to produce 50 percent of its energy with renewables by 2030? What global citizen actions need to be undertaken to help reach this goal? Eban Goodstein, director of Bard Center for Environmental Policy, answers these questions and more in this hopeful and informative talk.

A Case for Giving Climate Migrants Protected Legal Status

With climate change already affecting vast regions of the planet, Bard College's Brian Mateo makes the case for expanding legal protections for refugees to include people displaced due to environmental issues. Whether by updating the 1951 Convention or working on a new global agreement, Mateo writes that this an urgent human rights issue for vulnerable populations today and future generations.

Need for a New Consensus

Foreign policy experts are having diffuclty linking the negative implications of a shift towards trasactionalism for U.S. foreign aid to voters. This begs the question: Should there be a clear quid pro quo for U.S. assistance?





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.