Here is a link to my recent working paper on citizenship and social justice:

Citizenship and Social Justice in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and S...

In this paper, I focus on the ways that distribution of social resources is framed by particular citizenship policies and implicit views of justice in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia, the three successor states of the former socialist federation of Yugoslavia. I was motivated to know more about the nature of the relation between citizenship and social resource distributive policies, but I also wanted to assess their justifiability and grounding in moral and political norms. Basically, by looking at the overlapping citizenship regimes that characterize relations among these successor states, I tried to determine the ways in which they do or do not conform to particular principles of social justice.

This is a working paper version, hopefully to become a journal article soon. So, I'm interested in your comments on the piece.

Also, my interests are somewhat driven towards what I believe is a field of international relations, ethics and political science that has remained relatively under-researched - something I would call the comparative ethics of citizenship. Namely, I'm interested in comparing different citizenship regimes against norms of ethics (not only of membership, but also of distribution, participation, equality...etc.). While there has been some good theorizing on the topic, very few authors address the issue from a comparative and theoretical perspective at the same time, especially when it comes to under-researched citizenship regimes, such as those in the Balkans (that the team of researchers associated with the CITSEE project in Edinburgh tried to analyze). 

Anybody else having similar thoughts? Any ideas? Do you think comparing different citizenship regimes in the context of a set of ethical principles is a good idea? 

Views: 135

Tags: Citizenship, ethics, justice


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Global Ethics Weekly: Millennials, Climate Change, & Foreign Policy, with Nikolas Gvosdev

Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev discusses the generational divide in U.S. politics in the context of foreign policy and the environment. What are the international implications of initiatives like the Green New Deal? What would an "America First" environmental policy look like? And what happens if the U.S. continues to take a backseat on this issue?

A Thousand Small Sanities: The Moral Adventure of Liberalism, with Adam Gopnik

In his eloquent defense of liberalism, Adam Gopnik goes back to its origins and argues that rather than being emphasizing the role of the individual, "two principles, the principle of community and the principle of compromise," are at the core of the liberal project. Indeed, these are the essential elements of humane, pluralist societies; and in an age of autocracy, our very lives may depend on their continued existence.

Global Ethics Weekly: The Mueller Report & U.S. Foreign Policy, with Jonathan Cristol

A lot of the talk about the Mueller Report has focused on its political and legal implications, but how will it affect U.S. foreign policy? Adelphi College's Jonathan Cristol discusses the reactions of allies and adversaries to Trump's passivity in the face of massive Russian interference in the U.S. election and congressional inaction and public apathy concerning presidential corruption. Plus, he details recent U.S. policy moves on Iran and the significance of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg's speech to U.S. Congress.





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.