Here is a link to my recent working paper on citizenship and social justice:

Citizenship and Social Justice in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and S...

In this paper, I focus on the ways that distribution of social resources is framed by particular citizenship policies and implicit views of justice in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia, the three successor states of the former socialist federation of Yugoslavia. I was motivated to know more about the nature of the relation between citizenship and social resource distributive policies, but I also wanted to assess their justifiability and grounding in moral and political norms. Basically, by looking at the overlapping citizenship regimes that characterize relations among these successor states, I tried to determine the ways in which they do or do not conform to particular principles of social justice.

This is a working paper version, hopefully to become a journal article soon. So, I'm interested in your comments on the piece.

Also, my interests are somewhat driven towards what I believe is a field of international relations, ethics and political science that has remained relatively under-researched - something I would call the comparative ethics of citizenship. Namely, I'm interested in comparing different citizenship regimes against norms of ethics (not only of membership, but also of distribution, participation, equality...etc.). While there has been some good theorizing on the topic, very few authors address the issue from a comparative and theoretical perspective at the same time, especially when it comes to under-researched citizenship regimes, such as those in the Balkans (that the team of researchers associated with the CITSEE project in Edinburgh tried to analyze). 

Anybody else having similar thoughts? Any ideas? Do you think comparing different citizenship regimes in the context of a set of ethical principles is a good idea? 

Views: 150

Tags: Citizenship, ethics, justice


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

In Solidarity

The killing of George Floyd is another tragic moment in the long and painful history of racism in America. We feel the anger that arises from this assault on human decency. We hear the cries for action. The Council stands in solidarity with the millions of citizens who are raising their voices demanding change. Carnegie Council's motto is Ethics matter. We believe Black Lives Matter.

Vox Populi: What Americans Think About Foreign Policy, with Dina Smeltz & Mark Hannah

What do Americans think about the role the United States should be playing in the world? How do they conceive of the different trade-offs between domestic and international affairs, among competing options and sets of interests and values? The Chicago Council on Global Affairs' Dina Smeltz and Eurasia Group Foundation's Mark Hannah share the results of surveys from their organizations in this conversation with Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev.

China's Changing Role in the Pandemic-Driven World, with Amitai Etzioni & Nikolas Gvosdev

How has the pandemic changed U.S-China relations? How has it altered China's relationship with other nations and its geopolitical positioning? George Washington University's Amitai Etzioni and Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev discuss these questions and more as they break down "great power competition" in the era of COVID-19.





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.