I've been reading the new "Voices from the Global Spring" collection edited by Anya Schiffrin and Eamon Kircher-Allen. It is a country-by-country account of recent activism, stretching from Cairo to lower Manhattan. In the foreword, Jeffrey Sachs outlines what he calls a "global new progressive movement." He sees that the worldwide protests have had four primary targets: "extreme inequality of wealth and income, the impunity of the rich, the corruption of government, and the collapse of public services." His prediction is that the future of the protest movement will involve four types of actions:

  1. Social activism to raise public awareness of the threats to society from the massive inequality of wealth and power.
  2. Activism to bring key economic sectors under more democratic control (Consumer boycotts, shareholder activism, etc.).
  3. An affirmative view of politics in which government once again takes on the challenges of quality education, science, technology, job training, environmental protection, and modern infrastructure.
  4. The struggle for political power itself, in which candidates for the poor and middle class will have to win elections.

His sense is that the blame (in the United States) lies with an irresponsible wealthy elite that is squandering the advantages that America built up over decades: "The rich have lost their sense of responsibility and are far more interested in their next yacht or private plane than in paying the price of civilization through honest and responsible taxation and investment."

And while youth unemployment is a common problem from Egypt to America, Sachs also has faith in the youth to use their new horizontal networking skills to out-maneuver the incumbent powers.

Only spring will tell.

[PHOTO CREDIT: Josef Weidenholzer (CC).]

Views: 171

Tags: 99percent, egypt, employment, fairness, inequality, occupy, prosperity, protest


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Killer Robots, Ethics, & Governance, with Peter Asaro

Peter Asaro, co-founder of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control, has a simple solution for stopping the future proliferation of killer robots, or lethal autonomous weapons: "Ban them." What are the ethical and logistical risks of this technology? How would it change the nature of warfare? And with the U.S. and other nations currently developing killer robots, what is the state of governance?

As Biden Stalls, Is the "Restorationist" Narrative Losing Ground?

U.S. Global Engagement Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev notes that former Vice President Joe Biden is, in foreign policy terms, most associated with a "restorationist" approach. How does this differentiate from other candidates? What approach will resonate most with voters?

Democratic Candidates & Foreign Policy after Iowa, with Nikolas Gvosdev

With the (incomplete) results of the Iowa Caucus putting the spotlight on Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, what do we know about their foreign policy platforms? How do they differentiate themselves from Joe Biden? Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev shares his thoughts and touches on voters' possible perception of Sanders as a "socialist" and how climate change could become an issue in this election.





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.