I've been reading the new "Voices from the Global Spring" collection edited by Anya Schiffrin and Eamon Kircher-Allen. It is a country-by-country account of recent activism, stretching from Cairo to lower Manhattan. In the foreword, Jeffrey Sachs outlines what he calls a "global new progressive movement." He sees that the worldwide protests have had four primary targets: "extreme inequality of wealth and income, the impunity of the rich, the corruption of government, and the collapse of public services." His prediction is that the future of the protest movement will involve four types of actions:

  1. Social activism to raise public awareness of the threats to society from the massive inequality of wealth and power.
  2. Activism to bring key economic sectors under more democratic control (Consumer boycotts, shareholder activism, etc.).
  3. An affirmative view of politics in which government once again takes on the challenges of quality education, science, technology, job training, environmental protection, and modern infrastructure.
  4. The struggle for political power itself, in which candidates for the poor and middle class will have to win elections.

His sense is that the blame (in the United States) lies with an irresponsible wealthy elite that is squandering the advantages that America built up over decades: "The rich have lost their sense of responsibility and are far more interested in their next yacht or private plane than in paying the price of civilization through honest and responsible taxation and investment."

And while youth unemployment is a common problem from Egypt to America, Sachs also has faith in the youth to use their new horizontal networking skills to out-maneuver the incumbent powers.

Only spring will tell.

[PHOTO CREDIT: Josef Weidenholzer (CC).]

Views: 159

Tags: 99percent, egypt, employment, fairness, inequality, occupy, prosperity, protest


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

The Power of Tribalism, with Amy Chua & Walter Russell Mead

"In our foreign policy, for at least half a century, we have been spectacularly blind to the power of tribal politics," says Amy Chua, author of "Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations." What does this mean in 2019? How can Americans move past tribalism? Don't miss this conversation with Chua and Bard College's Walter Russell Mead, moderated by Bard's Roger Berkowitz.

Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics, & Political Responsibility, with Stephen Gardiner

University of Washington's Professor Stephen Gardiner discusses the ethics of climate change from intergenerational, political, and personal perspectives. Should individuals feel bad for using plastic straws or eating meat? What should the UN and its member states do? And how can older generations make up for "a massive failure in leadership" that has led, in part, to the current crisis?

C2G Update: Nature-based Solutions, the UN, & the IPCC Reports, with Janos Pasztor

Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G), gives an update on his team's work after a busy week in New York. In the wake of troubling IPCC reports on climate change's effect on the oceans and land use, what more can the UN do? What are the challenges of nature-based solutions? And how should we handle climate change fatigue, individually and on a societal level?





© 2019   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.