How Do We Bring the Rule of Law to Places That Don't Have It?

Event Details

How Do We Bring the Rule of Law to Places That Don't Have It?

Time: March 20, 2012 from 12:30pm to 2pm
Location: University of Southern California
City/Town: Los Angeles
Website or Map:…
Phone: (213) 740-5499
Event Type: roundtable
Organized By: Levan Institute for Humanities and Ethics
Latest Activity: Feb 15, 2012

Export to Outlook or iCal (.ics)

Event Description

The rule of law is one of the most cherished governmental principles in dozens of countries around the world. Unfortunately, many places in the world lack the rule of law as a governing principle - and these places tend to violate the human rights of their citizens and have blatant corruption in their government. This interdisciplinary panel will consider important questions relating to the rule of law, including: What factors are necessary to help bring the rule of law to places that don't have it? How can accountability be instituted and impunity ended in these states? What powers do judicial officials require in order for their rulings and orders to have the most impact?


Richard Dekmejian, USC Dornsife Department of Political Science

Naama Haviv, Jewish World Watch

David Ritchie, Law and Philosophy, Mercer University, Carnegie Global Ethics Fellow

Edwin Smith, Law, International Relations, and Political Science, USC Gould School of Law

Moderated by: Lyn Boyd-Judson, Director, Levan Institute for Humanities and Ethics, Carnegie Global Ethics Fellow

Comment Wall

Carnegie Council

Privacy, Surveillance, & the Terrorist Trap, with Tom Parker

How can investigators utilize new technology like facial recognition software while respecting the rights of suspects and the general public? What are the consequences of government overreaction to terrorist threats? Tom Parker, author of "Avoiding the Terrorist Trap," discusses privacy, surveillance, and more in the context of counterterrorism.

A Parting of Values: America First versus Transactionalism

"The existing divide in American foreign policy discourse has been the extent to which the U.S. must actively propagate and spread its values, or defend them or promote them even when there is no interest at stake," writes Senior Fellow Nikolas Gvosdev. How does American civil society demand consideration of moral and ethical concerns in the decisions both to go to war and how the war will be prosecuted?

Suleimani Is Dead, but Diplomacy Shouldn’t Be

Carnegie Council fellow and Pacific Delegate Philip Caruso advocates for the value of diplomacy in the aftermath of the U.S. killing Iran's general Qassem Suleimani. "Iran cannot win a war against the United States, nor can the United States afford to fight one," he argues. This article was originally published in "Foreign Policy" and is posted here with kind permission.





© 2020   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.