Less than a week ago, Syrian President Bashar Assad addressed his country via television, denouncing his opponents as enemies of God, and puppets of the West. 21 months of civil war that has wiped 60,000 lives single-handedly has ut life in his country into a state of disarray. Assad has spoken out with his perspectives on the issues in his country after speaking to the Russian media in November last year, and after nearly eight months of speaking in Syria.  

This time, Assad has a plan that claims that his army will stop military operations, but continue to retain the right to defend state interests, provided other countries ceased to arm terrorist groups. He then said that a national dialogue conference will follow, where the government, civil society and political parties will meet in a bid to seek an agreement on a national charter to be put to a referendum. This would then be followed by parliamentary elections leading to the formation of a new government.

Almost immediately after they were announced, the Syrian National Coalition (SNC) rejected the proposals, asserting that the President wanted only solutions that would continue to have him in a position of control. The SNC was not willing to accept anything besides Assad’s departure. One other group, the National Coordination Body for Democratic Change in Syria (NCB) — which, incidentally, is tolerated by the regime — says that it will not enter into talks unless the violence comes to an end. The UN Secretary General expressed disappointment that the Assad plan in rejects the UN proposal for a transitional governing body.

Assad’s proposal shows that he has recognized that only a political solution will help. It doesn’t help that he decided to speak ill of the opposition – it might just catalyse stronger feelings of antagonism. Nevertheless, it is true that weapons have been given to the insurgents – but none of the countries that gave these weapons might agree comfortably to the prospect of representative democracy in Syria.

With the West viewing Syria’s case as transitory, and that Assad has to step down, Russia’s calls for political reform and a new political solution are not coming to bear fruit. The real and the best solution must come from the Syrian people themselves. Until that voice is heard, all else has less bearing.


Views: 74

Tags: Assad, Change, Political, Regime, Solutions, Syria


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Global Ethics Weekly: A "Peace Regime" on the Korean Peninsula?

In this new podcast series, we'll be connecting current events to Carnegie Council resources through conversations with our Senior Fellows. This week, Devin Stewart discusses how his essay defending the Singapore Summit holds up a month later. Plus, he and host Alex Woodson speak about Mike Pompeo's strange and unproductive trip to Pyongyang, what a "peace regime" could look like, and the prospects for a unified Korean Peninsula.

Asia's "Opinion Wars" with Historian Alexis Dudden

As part of our new Information Warfare podcast series, University of Connecticut historian Alexis Dudden looks at the propaganda efforts coming out of Northeast Asia, with a focus on China's Confucius Institutes at American universities. Is China trying to spread its communist ideology through these centers or just teach its language to college students? Are the U.S. and Japan "guilty" of similar efforts?

Politics and Cartography: The Power of Deception through Distortion

"Cartography is a powerful instrument of national policy, one that governments can use to influence peoples' beliefs and affect international affairs. With the simple stroke of a pen—or click of a mouse—the entire meaning of a map can change. These political distortions are far more worrisome than unavoidable geographic distortions, in that cartographers have introduced deception into the process for political purposes."


E&IA Journal


© 2018   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service