Less than a week ago, Syrian President Bashar Assad addressed his country via television, denouncing his opponents as enemies of God, and puppets of the West. 21 months of civil war that has wiped 60,000 lives single-handedly has ut life in his country into a state of disarray. Assad has spoken out with his perspectives on the issues in his country after speaking to the Russian media in November last year, and after nearly eight months of speaking in Syria.  

This time, Assad has a plan that claims that his army will stop military operations, but continue to retain the right to defend state interests, provided other countries ceased to arm terrorist groups. He then said that a national dialogue conference will follow, where the government, civil society and political parties will meet in a bid to seek an agreement on a national charter to be put to a referendum. This would then be followed by parliamentary elections leading to the formation of a new government.

Almost immediately after they were announced, the Syrian National Coalition (SNC) rejected the proposals, asserting that the President wanted only solutions that would continue to have him in a position of control. The SNC was not willing to accept anything besides Assad’s departure. One other group, the National Coordination Body for Democratic Change in Syria (NCB) — which, incidentally, is tolerated by the regime — says that it will not enter into talks unless the violence comes to an end. The UN Secretary General expressed disappointment that the Assad plan in rejects the UN proposal for a transitional governing body.

Assad’s proposal shows that he has recognized that only a political solution will help. It doesn’t help that he decided to speak ill of the opposition – it might just catalyse stronger feelings of antagonism. Nevertheless, it is true that weapons have been given to the insurgents – but none of the countries that gave these weapons might agree comfortably to the prospect of representative democracy in Syria.

With the West viewing Syria’s case as transitory, and that Assad has to step down, Russia’s calls for political reform and a new political solution are not coming to bear fruit. The real and the best solution must come from the Syrian people themselves. Until that voice is heard, all else has less bearing.


Views: 58

Tags: Assad, Change, Political, Regime, Solutions, Syria


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Global Ethics Forum Preview: The Ethics of Big Data with danah boyd

Next time on Global Ethics Forum, Microsoft Research’s danah boyd discusses the ethical and political implications of big data and artificial intelligence. In this excerpt, boyd explains to journalist Stephanie Sy some of the disturbing issues that arise when machine learning and algorithms are used in the criminal justice system.

What the Qur'an Meant: And Why It Matters with Garry Wills

Northwestern's Garry Wills says that he was surprised to learn that Islam is a much more "inclusive" religion than Judaism or Christianity.

The Future of War: A History, with Lawrence Freedman

"Though most of the literature you will read on the future of war certainly talks about war as between regular armies, as proper fights, now with drones or with autonomous vehicles or robots or whatever, or even painless--cyber and so on--yet actually the reality of war is as it has always been: it is vicious, and it is nasty, and it kills the wrong people, and it does so in considerable numbers."



© 2017   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service