Democracy in the world was not criticized only by a lazy person, because the thesis that democracy is a bad form of government does not cause me any surprise. However, personally, I am not a fan of supporting conversations like “democracy is not suitable for our country”. I believe that a country naturally has the form of government that suits it most. The one for which people are ready.

Under a democratic system, every person knows from childhood that he has the right to vote and the right to choose. Another thing is whether he uses it. Bernard Shaw, an Englishman who lived under the monarchical regime, has a priceless statement: “Democracy cannot rise above the level of the human material from which its voters are made.”

Under a formal democratic system in any country, frequent abuses and falsification of elections are possible. That is, in fact, the right to vote is taken away from people. The people's aphorism of the post-Soviet space very well reflects these situations - “If you don’t have your mouth closed, but you are still silent, it means democracy has come.”

The same, if the right to vote exists nominally, however, there are frequent calls to take this right away from any group of the population. For example, retirees, as they support "not those". In women, as they "are guided by false criteria."

The level of thinking, respect for oneself and others, recognition of the freedom to choose oneself and another, the conscientiousness of choice and acceptance by people of one’s compatriots determines the level of democracy in the country.

Akhmetbek Zhanibek Serikovich

Kostanay State University named after A.Baitursynov

Master's student 1 course

Views: 24

Tags: #essaycontest2018


You need to be a member of Global Ethics Network to add comments!

Join Global Ethics Network

Carnegie Council

Myanmar and the Plight of the Rohingya, with Elliott Prasse-Freeman

The Rohingya are seen as fundamentally 'other,' says Prasse-Freeman. "Hence, even if they have formal citizenship, they wouldn't really be accepted as citizens, as full members of the polity." Could Aung San Suu Kyi have done more to prevent the persecution? How important was the hate speech on Facebook? How can the situation be resolved? Don't miss this informative and troubling conversation.

Global Ethics Weekly: The Right to Science, with Helle Porsdam

The right to benefit from scientific progress was enshrined in the United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, explains University of Copenhagen's Professor Helle Porsdam. Unfortunately, many people, including scientists and policymakers, don't know much about it. How was the right to science developed? What are examples? And, with an anti-science administration in the White House today, what are the contentious issues?

Internet Trolls in the U.S. and Mexico, with Saiph Savage

Professor Saiph Savage is an activist scholar and technology expert who is using large-scale data to study the sophisticated ways in which trolls target certain groups and bombard them with misinformation--for example U.S. Latinos were targeted in the 2018 midterm elections as were Mexicans in their 2018 presidential election. But her message is one of hope. In Mexico, citizens eventually saw through misinformation campaigns and others can too.





© 2018   Created by Carnegie Council.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

The views and opinions expressed in the media, comments, or publications on this website are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions held by Carnegie Council.